Search found 26 matches

by Gerry Nightingale
Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:55 am
Forum: Introductions
Topic: Karl Brehwens
Replies: 3
Views: 4339

Re: Karl Brehwens

Greetings to Karl B.! What an interesting career path you have chosen w/regard to bio-science! I would be interested to read of your views regarding bio-chemical interactions in response to a stimulus...such as continuous exposure to an EM field. I am looking for ways to "explain" cellular adaptatio...
by Gerry Nightingale
Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:25 pm
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

Steven. In regard to "GP", have you ever considered the overall implication(s)? By this I am referring to the possibilities of an EM field as a "pre-cursor" state...a tensor-metric of potential (this preserves Relativity as well as associated postulates, such as Newton, et al.) The intriguing aspect...
by Gerry Nightingale
Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:00 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Unresolved problems in physics
Replies: 9
Views: 12226

Re: Unresolved problems in physics

StevenS..."Good on 'ya, mate! I have read thru the "links". The "answers' to the "unresolved problems in physics" will NEVER be answered by the use of "particles". Unless or until a different approach is used, virtually no answers will ever reveal themselves. Any approach to a physics problem that h...
by Gerry Nightingale
Thu Oct 09, 2014 2:18 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Spooky action at a distance, you bet!
Replies: 9
Views: 10877

Re: Spooky action at a distance, you bet!

StevenS...Guten Morgen! So...you think the answers available regarding lightning are "wishy-washy?" Me too! The question of charge-potentials in cloud formations is, to me, unanswerable from an ab initio state if modern theories are used. I mentioned this on 3 sites, and the only responses I could g...
by Gerry Nightingale
Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:17 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

Greetings yet again to StevenS. As I looked thru the "posts" I noticed that you mentioned one possible reason(s) for being "banned" is my making claims w/nothing to "back it up"...I have a severe issue w/this! I NEVER write anything w/o considering it first, at least wrt physics theory. I consider e...
by Gerry Nightingale
Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:17 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

StevenS...Cheers! I regret that I was not very successful in the "money" dept. for most of my life...(I spent the bulk of my younger years "treading water", more or less...generally "less") The main reason? A complete inability on my part to "connect" w/others. I have never had any real friends or s...
by Gerry Nightingale
Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:43 pm
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

Cheers to StevenS! I see we have at least some "ground potential"<(haha) wrt time as an arbitrary function! Excellent! When I was much younger, I held out great hopes for "grand new theories" that could reveal the 'truth of things". Now, at sixty, I have found almost NOTHING of any real consequence ...
by Gerry Nightingale
Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:10 pm
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

StevenS...how's the water situation in Australia...is it as bad as seems to be? At least wrt rainfall averages. In reference to my rebuttal of "Time" as a true component of the Universe, I stand w/my assessments. Wrt denial of current theory, may I submit that there is NO definitive model of "time" ...
by Gerry Nightingale
Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:55 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Not your average BIG Bang theory
Replies: 14
Views: 17761

Re: Not your average BIG Bang theory

Cheers to StevenS! In regard to your "Time" models of "past" and "future" tenses...I am forced to disagree. To me, there is no "actuality of time" as a "real thing". As I see it, the only validity of time is as a numerical concept only, an arbitrary condition of measure. ...... As for "Big Bang?" I ...
by Gerry Nightingale
Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:33 am
Forum: General discussion - talk physics
Topic: Spooky action at a distance, you bet!
Replies: 9
Views: 10877

Re: Spooky action at a distance, you bet!

StevenS I am sorry to hear you have yet to have any official "proofing" of your work (I'm assuming this) I have read your posits, and I believe there is substance here to work with...although there is definite lack of explanation(s) with regard to "causality". I do see direct corollaries involved w/...